Friday, 9 December 2011

NOL (LIM&TAN)

S$1.12-NOLS.SI
? NOL said it is “currently not making another bid for a stake in Hapag-Lloyd (Hapag) . . . . . it will make necessary announcements when appropriate”.

? A German paper last week reported of talks between NOL and TUI, which owns 38% of Hapag. The article also noted that NOL’s previous bid had valued Hapag at 3.5 bln euros / S$6 bln at today’s exchange rate, and that a deal between TUI and an investment company in 2009 had valued Hapag at 4.45 bln euros.

? NOL’s “clarification” however does not, in our opinion, at all rule out it making another go for Hapag, not when the case for acquisition (or merger) is as valid as ever.

(Last week, Mediterranean Shipping of Switzerland, and CMA CGM of France announced an alliance, which will make them the largest in the world with 21.7% market share, vs the current leader Maersk with 15.8%.)

? Assuming NOL does go after Hapag, let’s examine likely impact.

- Because of the steep drop in its share price, NOL’s current market cap is only about S$2.9 bln.

- And with its massive order for new large vessels (as has Hapag according to media reports), the main issue would be funding.

- International banks, especially European, are not presently, in the mood to lend given the ongoing crisis.

- Convertible bond issue is not an attractive option (for sure unlikely an “acceptable” convertible premium), given NOL’s depressed share price.

- Which means a massive rights issue, and unfortunately, we have seen rather violent market reaction, eg K-Reit, which recently fell 16% on such news.

- Furthermore, with its latest NAV of US$1.14 / S$1.46, a deeply discounted pricing for the rights would be shareholders value destruction.

? NOL therefore merits at best a NEUTRAL rating given its unattractive fundaments (eg operating in a depressed sector: also last week, MISC of Malaysia said it would quit container shipping after losing US$789 mln over 3 years.).

? Technically, NOL has been stuck in the $1.00-1.17 range for the last 4 months.

No comments: