Saturday, 21 March 2009

Published March 21, 2009

No assurance of profit for Q4, says Jasper

By JAMIE LEE

OFFSHORE oil and gas drilling and services company Jasper Investments may post a fourth-quarter loss as a result of lower revenue and issues over a loan by one of its units.

Jasper said yesterday that its unit Neptune Marine Oil & Gas has agreed to reduce 'amounts to be invoiced' to client Petroleous de Venezuela (PDVSA) from December 2008 to January 2009.

'This reduction, with other downtime in the ordinary course of the Neptune Group's operations, translates to significantly lower-than-average operating efficiency for Q4 ending March 31, 2009,' Jasper said. This will drag down operating margins for the quarter, it added, though it did not say by how much. BT was unable to contact the company last night. Jasper said that if revenue from PDVSA falls short of the conditions of a US$290 million loan, Neptune will seek a waiver from its lenders.

Earlier this month, Jasper said that another client, India's Reliance Industries, had terminated a contract for a drill-ship called Explorer. Explorer was undergoing an upgrade which, when completed, would allow Jasper to draw down a second tranche of a term facility, its latest financial statement showed.

The company said that it was working with Reliance to reach a 'mutually satisfactory agreement over the termination of the contract', while looking at other options for the drill-ship.

Neptune said yesterday that it is looking to extend an existing bridging loan and to secure a replacement contract for Explorer. This is so that it can draw down 'tranche B' of the US$290 million loan facility and 'cure any potential breaches of the facility and the existing bridging loan', Jasper said. 'There is no assurance that the group will be able to record a profit for the fourth quarter of FY2009,' it said.

Jasper posted a net loss of US$426,000 for Q3 ended Dec 31, compared with a US$1.52 million loss a year earlier. For the nine months, it reported a net profit of US$5.19 million, reversing a US$139,000 loss a year earlier.

Published March 21, 2009

KepLand defers construction of Marina Bay Suites

Building of Madison Residences also delayed by current market conditions

By KALPANA RASHIWALA

KEPPEL Land is deferring construction of the highly touted Marina Bay Suites (in which it has one-third stake) as well as Madison Residences in Bukit Timah, citing 'current market conditions'. KepLand is developing the 221-unit Marina Bay Suites jointly with Cheung Kong Holdings/Hutchison Whampoa and Hongkong Land.

DELAYED
Worsening sentiment in the high-end residential sector

In a filing with the Singapore Exchange yesterday, KepLand announced construction deferral of the 56-unit Madison Residences on the former Naga Court site in Bukit Timah.

The group had earlier managed to sell just one unit in the project, at about $1,740 per square foot, in the second half of last year. However, a KepLand spokeswoman told BT yesterday that the sale of that unit has been cancelled by mutual agreement. 'We are unable to provide details due to confidentiality,' she added. When asked, she also revealed that 'a decision has been made to defer the commencement of the main construction of Marina Bay Suites'. However, construction of another of the group's residential projects in Singapore, The Promont, located in Cairnhill, will continue.

It has been one postponement after another for Marina Bay Suites because of deteriorating sentiment in the high-end residential sector. The tripartite partnership developing the condo had initially hoped to launch the project around end-January last year, but this was delayed to later the same quarter, and even then, that did not happen. The project has not been launched to date.

KepLand's spokeswoman did not say how long the construction deferments for Marina Bay Suites and Madison Residences will be.

In its release to SGX, KepLand said the construction deferment for Madison Residences is not expected to have any significant impact on the consolidated earnings per share and net tangible asset per share of the company for the current financial year ending Dec 31, 2009.

Separately, construction group KSH Holdings also said in a statutory filing with SGX yesterday that it has agreed to the request of Keppel Land Realty to defer the construction of Madison Residences. The delay is not expected to have any material effect on KSH for the financial year ending March 31, 2009. KSH announced in April last year that it had won a $53 million contract from Keppel Land Realty relating to the construction of Madison Residences.

In January, Keppel Land's group chief executive Kevin Wong said the group will conduct a review to see if it can delay building some of its projects. 'We are reviewing our operation costs as well as the project costs of all our development projects to trim fat and conserve cash, so that we can invest in any attractive opportunities that come along. 'This cost review exercise could include developing projects in phases to meet demand and even temporarily suspending the entire project if it does not add value to the company under current market conditions,' Mr Wong said then. Projects that are yet to be launched for sale are those that are most likely to be delayed both in Singapore and abroad, he added.

KepLand's earnings for the year ended Dec 31, 2008 fell 70.8 per cent to $227.7 million, from $779.7 million in FY 2007.

Published March 21, 2009

SingTel Optus wins movie-content licensing dispute

By WINSTON CHAI

AUSTRALIA'S New South Wales Supreme Court yesterday ruled in favour of Singapore Telecommunications' Australian subsidiary Optus in its licensing dispute with movie content provider TMNC (The Movie Network Channel).

TMNC, a supplier of movie channels to the Australian operator's pay-television unit Optus Vision, had taken the company to court, claiming that it was short-changed licensing fees and interest amounting to nearly half a billion Australian dollars.

TMNC represents four major movie studios - Warner Bros, Disney, MGM and Roadshow.

The outstanding amount came about because an escalation clause in its content supply contract with Optus Vision was triggered in 2002 and this led to an increase in monthly licensing fees, the firm claimed.

In its defence, Optus Vision said that TMNC had misinterpreted the clause and maintained that it has never been set off.

SingTel announced in a regulatory filing yesterday that the New South Wales Supreme Court had rejected TMNC's claims.

'Optus has always said it regarded this case as a play for cash and we have been vindicated by this morning's judgment,' Paul O'Sullivan, CEO of SingTel Optus, said in an e-mail response to BT.

With the case now put to rest, a larger victory is at stake for Optus later this month as it is one of four finalists in the race to secure the mammoth contract for building Australia's National Broadband Network (NBN).

The project to wire up the country for ultra-high-speed Internet access could cost around A$15 billion (S$15.5 billion) but it comes with a government subsidy of A$4.7 billion.

Australia's dominant telco Telstra has been excluded from the deal for not meeting government objectives, leaving Optus as the frontrunner. It is up against Melbourne-based Acacia, Canada's Axia NetMedia, as well as the Tasmanian Government and TransAct.

While it may be a boon for SingTel's overseas business in the long run, an Optus win could be bad news for shareholders, according to Kim Eng Research analyst Gregory Yap.

This is because it would require Optus to sink in billions into the effort and this could prompt SingTel to slash its dividend payout.

'As most of SingTel's cash flow already goes to paying dividends, it may have to raise debt but this could push net debt to Ebitda from 1x now to 1.5x, the highest in the sector. Cutting dividend payout of 45-60 per cent would reduce the debt needed,' he said in his client note.

Published March 21, 2009

Cortina's loss from theft cut to $3.3m

It has recovered and identified 230 watches worth about $4.6m

By JAMIE LEE

CORTINA Holdings has recovered almost 60 per cent of the maximum $7.9 million that it expected to lose after a stash of watches and thousands of dollars in cash went missing.

FOUND
Among the watches recovered may include the expensive Vacheron Constantin Les Masques set

The company said yesterday that it has recovered and identified 230 watches worth about $4.6 million, after its former employee Jerry Ee turned himself in at the Singapore embassy in Bangkok this week. This reduces Cortina's maximum loss to $3.3 million. Some 386 watches and more than $27,000 cash went missing from the company's Raffles City Shopping Centre outlet between Christmas and Boxing Day last year.

BT understands that Cortina's general manager Jeremy Lim has spent the past few days in Thailand inspecting the watches found there. It is also believed that the recovered watches may include rarer and more valuable pieces that went missing, such as a Patek Philippe 3939 worth about $500,000 and a set of Vacheron Constantin Les Masques watches worth about the same.

Mr Ee, who arrived back in Singapore from Thailand on Thursday, is set to be charged this morning, a source told BT. He also faces a civil suit from Cortina.

Published March 21, 2009

The great COE dilemma

Car lovers divided on renewing COE as prevailing quota premiums crash

By JOYCE HOOI

CAR lovers might not agree on which cars are worth loving, but they can collectively rejoice about Prevailing Quota Premiums (PQP) hitting their lowest levels since 1991.

MEN AND THEIR MACHINES
Car aficionados David Chan and son Brian are leaping at the chance to renew their COEs early despite having to forgo the remaining COE values. PQPs have hit their lowest levels since 1991

With the PQP ranging from $3,000 to slightly over $5,000 since the start of the year, car collectors looking to renew their Certificates of Entitlement (COEs), are sitting up and taking notice of this timely respite for their costly hobby.

Car-collecting in Singapore is not cheap, especially if the cars in question are not under the Classic Car Scheme, in which owners pay only 10 per cent of the PQP to renew their COEs.

For normal-plate cars, on top of the full PQP that has to be paid, most collectible cars tend to be more than ten years old and are subjected to an annual road tax surcharge of 10 to 50 per cent of the road tax.

It is little wonder then that car aficionados, such as David Chan and his son Brian, are leaping at the chance to renew their COEs early.

'These are heritage cars. They have been through hell to stay on the roads. We will pay through our noses for them. We are not rich. We are working-class. But you can't give up your hobby.'

Al Bala,
the Singapore representative for the Malaysia and Singapore Vintage Car Register

The older Mr Chan is prepared to forgo the remaining value on his COE - which cost over $18,000 and expires in 2011 - for his 1965 Alfa Romeo Giulia Sprint GT.

His son is also renewing the COE for his 1972 MGB Roadster ahead of its expiry in 2011.

'I'm not taking chances. We are going for it. I have never seen before a PQP at $4,500,' said Mr Chan, who runs David Works Garage - a workshop that specialises in classic and vintage cars - together with his son.

This is a far cry from the last few rounds of COE renewals that Mr Chan had endured for the sake of his beloved cars.

In 2000, Mr Chan forked out $40,000 for the COE of his 1974 Lotus Europa.

'We practically had to pawn everything we owned,' he added in jest.

Car collectors are as divided over the issue of early COE renewals as they are on whether 'collector' is a derogatory term.

Al Bala, the Singapore representative for the Malaysia and Singapore Vintage Car Register, is not opting for an early renewal of the Category A COE for his 1974 Volkswagen Beetle, even though he says that he paid about ten times the current PQP for the last round of renewal.

'I'm not willing to lose the remaining $12,000 that I have on my COE which will expire in 2011,' he said.

Terence Foo, who owns two collectible cars, reckons that there are only two good reasons to renew the COE early.

According to him, car owners who intend to sell their cars with a fast-expiring COE might consider it to sweeten the deal for prospective buyers.

'The second reason to renew early is that you expect the COE price to recover to such a crazy level two or three years later, that you will not be able to afford to renew it then,' he said.

For car enthusiasts with cars no more than 10 years old, COE renewals pose an additional quandary - the opportunity cost of the Preferential Additional Registration Fee (PARF) rebate.

Mr Foo had renewed one of his collectible car's COE in 2006 for $12,193, but the PARF rebate value foregone had been almost nine times that, at $93,000.

For car hobbyists, however, the value of their vehicles cannot be distilled into pure dollars and cents.

Mr Foo had spent $17,774 on renewing the COE on his hand-built 1985 Audi Quattro in 2005 despite only driving it for 200km to 300km a year. 'It's something that defies logic, actually,' he said.

Over the last decade, the population of cars aged 20 years and older have been shrinking steadily, from 21,535 cars in 1999 to just 2,897 cars last year, according to the Land Transport Authority (LTA). As of last month, the number of cars under the LTA's vintage and classic car schemes were 120 and 220, respectively.

While the issue of early COE renewal is debatable, the question of keeping these cars on the road is no question at all, despite growing economic uncertainty.

A check with various motoring communities in Singapore revealed that none of its members are letting any vehicles go.

'These are heritage cars. They have been through hell to stay on the roads. We will pay through our noses for them,' said Mr Bala.

And lest it is assumed that all car collectors are wealthy Bentley-driving types who can easily afford the related expenses, car lovers will have you know that this is patently not the case.

'We are not rich. We are working-class. But you can't give up your hobby,' Mr Bala said.

Published March 21, 2009

Civil servants to get pay cut

By TEH SHI NING

THE Public Service Division (PSD) yesterday confirmed that civil servants will see a pay cut this year, given the slowdown in Singapore's economy. But last year's performance bonuses will still be paid out this month.

Civil servants' annual salaries will first be reduced via pay components linked to economic performance. These include the GDP Bonus paid to senior civil servants, and the Annual Variable Component (AVC), usually paid out to civil servants in the middle and at the end of the year.

'The drop is to be expected as it is consistent with our salary policy which pegs the annual pay of civil servants to pay levels in the private sector,' said Ong Toon Hui, PSD director (Leadership Development).

No GDP bonus will be paid this year, and 2009's AVC is also expected to be lower, or possibly even zero, the PSD said. However, performance bonuses, which are paid out in March for work done last year, will still be awarded based on individual merit.

Civil servants were told to expect the salary drop in a staff circular dated March 16, and the civil service unions have also been informed.

The PSD said that the civil service will adhere to the National Wages Council's guidelines in deciding salary adjustments for 2009, and consult the unions after the council issues its recommendations. Therefore, the exact extent of pay cuts cannot be revealed before then.




Ms Ong said: 'If economic conditions continue to deteriorate, further adjustments in salaries will likely be necessary.'

The PSD added that statutory boards have been informed of the expected drop in civil service pay, but as autonomous agencies are not required to follow the civil service's pay adjustments. 

Published March 21, 2009

We can't be like the Last of the Mohicans

MM Lee highlights dilemma of Singapore's low birth rate and need for talent

By LEE U-WEN

ONE constant worry on Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew's mind these days is babies - specifically, a shortage of them.

The country's poor birth rate of just 1.29 is a problem, he said, and unless that figure can move up to the replaceable level of 2.1, there is a fear that foreigners in Singapore could well make up the majority of the population in time to come.

But at the same time, the Republic's hands are tied as, like most countries around the world, it cannot prosper without the contributions of foreign talent in society.

'We are caught in a bind. We have got to decide that this is our country, our society and we must remain the majority. Yes, we will take in immigrants, but we must be the majority, otherwise they will change us,' he said yesterday as he mapped out his vision for Singapore in the next 25 years.

He was speaking in a 75-minute dialogue organised in conjunction with the official opening of the National University of Singapore Society's new alumni complex at its Kent Ridge campus.

'I think 25 years from now, Singapore will be more cosmopolitan. There are many people from China, India, Malaysia; we have European children doing National Service. Their parents have come here, seen that this is a nice place, and have chosen to stay here because we offer equal opportunities,' he said.




What puzzles Mr Lee, however, is why Singaporeans are still not reproducing even with various incentives such as baby bonuses and the provision of top-quality child care.

He cited a number of worrying statistics: many Singaporean women are marrying later, well into their 30s, with some not tying the knot at all. About a third of male Singaporean graduates also choose to remain single.

'Maybe their standards are too high,' he said to much laughter from his audience of academics, policymakers, government officials and students. 'The same is happening in China. Even in Japan, the women are not marrying. And this creates a problem for us, and without new citizens or PRs, we are going to be like the Last of the Mohicans.'

Turning to another big worry - the global economic crisis - Mr Lee said that Singapore's economic growth model will still largely remain focused on exports even when the world makes a recovery. Singapore does not have a big domestic market, and has to rely mainly on exports, to the extent that its imports and exports are 'the highest in the world' as a percentage of gross domestic product.

'The optimistic scenario is that two to three years pass and we are out of this. At the worst, four to six years. The IMF (International Monetary Fund) and World Bank have said that Singapore, Hong Kong and Taiwan are all going to be hit, because we are export-dependent. But when recovery takes place, we know we are going to bounce back,' he said.

As far as Singapore's political future is concerned, the Minister Mentor said that he would not be perturbed if an opposition government comes into power in future. Rather, he would be more concerned over whether the people forming that new ruling party had the right mix of integrity, ability, experience and a willingness to do what is necessary for the country, and not for their personal interests.

As the dialogue drew to a close, Mr Lee once again stressed the fact that Singapore had to be 'sufficiently flexible and imaginative' as the world changes. And to fit in well would require a steady stream of talented people, both local and foreign.

'We will make Singapore a city that offers opportunities to all, and rewards everybody according to their contributions. There will be no discrimination,' he said. 'This will bring a lot of talent here. Can we do this? Yes, we can. Will it cause discomfort? Sure. Will it be right in the end? Yes.'

Singaporeans could not afford to be 'afraid' of talent, because not embracing them would hinder the country's progress, he said. 

Published March 21, 2009

Recession trumps the hotel card

As membership numbers take a hit, hotels fight back by offering sweeter deals

By BRITTANY KHOO AND LIEW AIQING

THE popularity of hotel cards is now at a discount. After thriving on offers of better room rates, restaurant discounts and spa packages, many issuers are reporting falling membership numbers.

For example, the Advantage Plus card, used by the Accor group of hotels, has seen sales slow down in recent months.

Grant O'Bree, regional manager of Singapore and Malaysia Advantage Plus, said that the number of new members has declined. 'Membership signups have been static since October last year,' he said.

'Towards the end of last year, we were still able to record 20 to 30 new sales a day. Now, there are some days where we only see 12 to 15.'

The St Regis Hotel finds itself in a similar situation. Its Astor Card, which was launched around September last year, has seen a dip in the number of members recently.

'There is definitely a contraction,' said a spokesman for the hotel. 'The take up was really good last year - the market embraced the card when it was first offered. In fact, we were surprised by the lack of buyer resistance to the price of the card.'

'Price was never really an issue for them,' the spokesman said, referring to the steep membership price of $788.

Facing such gloomy prospects, hotels are sweetening the pot in order to win back customers.

Membership at the Club at the Hyatt now comes with additional vouchers. The new vouchers can be used for hotel stays. This feature has been reintroduced after a three-year break.

Similarly, at the St Regis, additional vouchers are being given out. These vouchers can be used for a variety of services, one of which is the big group dining benefit.

A group of eight to 12 people will be able to dine and enjoy 50 per cent off the total bill. Now, members also have a three-hour grace period where they are entitled to free parking during weekdays.

Hotels are now cautiously optimistic. The St Regis expects to reach its cap of 2,000 members despite the downturn. 'Most of our members are able to continue their lifestyle despite the recession and, thus far, results have been promising,' said a spokesman.

Other hotels such as the Grand Hyatt are also banking on long-term clients.

Long-term members of both the Hyatt Gold Passport and Club at the Hyatt are buoying demand and the hotel looks to leverage on them to bring in even more members. Dining vouchers worth $50 are being offered to Hyatt members as referral incentives.

Advantage Plus is also using the same technique, offering free membership renewal to members who are able to get five people to sign up in a period of two weeks.

However, hotels may have to do more to capture the consumer's dollar.

At a time of economic recession, the cost of membership may appear particularly hefty to some.

'The new discounts and packages are not enough to offset the high cost of the membership,' said Thomas Yeo, who previously held several card memberships.

'After all, you are spending money to spend even more money.'

However, hotels beg to differ.

'We do not expect to see a drop inmembership numbers owing to the value for money benefits offered by the card,' a spokesman for Millenium Hotels Group said.

Mr O'Bree noted that the Asia-Pacific region has seen heartening sales figures of late, with membership growth exceeding last year's.

'The renewal rate for the card stands at approximately 65 per cent this year, up from 59 per cent last year.'

He said that hotel cards can be used to retain previous lifestyles during the credit crunch. 'These customers know that the card is value for money, which is especially important in tough times like these.'

Additional reporting by Jessica Yeo, Zeinab Yusuf and Zhang Yi Ting

Published March 21, 2009

Unemployment to rise: Macquarie Research

It forecasts rate to peak at 6-7%, revises 2009 GDP growth outlook to -6% from -3%

By VICTOR KATHEYAS

MACQUARIE Research expects Singapore's overall unemployment rate to peak at 6-7 per cent later this year. This is worse than during the electronics bust of 2001, when, on a seasonally adjusted basis, the overall unemployment rate rose to 3.6 per cent.

TAKING A BLOW
The severity of the contraction in full-year GDP is due mainly to the sizeable hits to key sectors of the economy - exports, finance and tourism

Macquarie also revised its 2009 gross domestic product (GDP) growth forecast to -6 per cent from -3 per cent, and said that incoming data indicated that the economy had contracted again in the first quarter of this year, with the magnitude 'now estimated to be worse than our prior expectations', at -9.2 per cent on a year-on-year basis, versus -6.5 per cent forecast previously.

The severity of the contraction in full-year GDP - which Macquarie said would be the 'worst ever' - is principally due to the 'synchronised sizeable hits' to key sectors of the economy, which it identified as being exports, finance and tourism.

As a result, most other sectors, such as retail and wholesale trade, business services and transportation, will be affected as well, as they are generally tied to the fate of these key sectors.

In particular, Macquarie said, Singapore's heavy dependence on electronic exports makes it 'particularly vulnerable to the cyclical global headwinds for that industry'.

Given the circumstances, unlike previous downturns, the government 'is likely to be more proactive in limiting the ongoing deterioration in the labour market', said Macquarie.

Apart from several fiscal measures announced by the government 'with broad-based targeting of different pressure points', the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has also shifted its currency-centred policy stance to a zero per cent appreciation of the Singapore dollar nominal effective exchange rate policy band.

While Macquarie doubts that the MAS will shift its stance to signal depreciation of the policy band at the April meeting, it said that the central bank was 'likely to re-centre the mid-point of the band'.

As such, it expects the Sing dollar-US dollar exchange rate to weaken to 1.6 in the near term before recovering later in the year.

Published March 21, 2009

Twist in the tale of 2 companies

Why did NOL get rapped while CapitaLand did not?

By LYNETTE KHOO

TWO companies, two similar responses. Why did one get rapped while the other didn't?

CapitaLand had declined to comment on Jan 7 when there were market rumours and a Dow Jones report on a potential rights issue.

Later, Neptune Orient Lines (NOL) also declined to comment on market rumours on March 10 after a Dow Jones report cited sources as saying that NOL was considering a rights issue.

Three days later, it denied outright plans of a rights issue.

The result: NOL got rapped by SGX for its boilerplate response to market rumours on a rights issue but CapitaLand didn't. This left market watchers wondering why the treatment was different when the initial responses of both companies to market rumours were the same. So what made the difference?

More light was shed on this issue yesterday. It has now emerged that CapitaLand had not made a submission to SGX when it gave a non-answer in its initial response to market rumours.

When contacted, a CapitaLand spokesperson told BT that it submitted its application to the Singapore Exchange for approval on the $1.84 billion rights issue on the same day when it made a public announcement on Feb 9.

Its real estate investment trust CapitaMall Trust (CMT) also announced a $1.23 billion rights issue on the same day.

A CMT spokesman told BT that its submission to SGX for approval of the rights issue was a confidential one but declined to say when the submission was made.

A submission for an underwritten rights issue before a public announcement is allowed under the new SGX measures that took effect on Jan 13.

A corporate finance advisor, who declined to be named, pointed to some differences in the approach taken by the two companies.

While CapitaLand declined to comment on market rumours on Jan 7, a second report by Dow Jones on Jan 23 - which said that it was mulling a rights issue to raise about $1.5 billion - apparently prompted the group to give further clarity. By then, its share price had plunged some 24 per cent.

The advisor felt that there is reason to give benefit of the doubt for CapitaLand. When CapitaLand first responded to market rumours on Jan 7, it might not have concrete plans yet. Over time, it may have narrowed down its options and been ready to disclose them in response to a second Dow Jones report on Jan 23.

If CapitaLand had said 'no comments' the second time, that would probably have triggered a reprimand from SGX, he said.

NOL was publicly reprimanded by SGX this week for not being 'sufficiently frank and explicit' enough in its response on March 10.

An issue manager who declined to be named said that the NOL episode was 'very unfortunate as somebody got to be the punching bag'.

Speculation was rife that NOL would carry out a rights issue after Dow Jones cited two people familiar with the situation that NOL was considering a rights issue of more than US$250 million to boost its capital base. This sent its shares into a tailspin, falling below a dollar mark.

In such a situation which could suggest possible leakage, 'to say something akin to not commenting on market rumours is not correct', said the corporate finance advisor. The advisor felt that perhaps NOL should have responded in the same manner as CapitaLand did in its second response.

Industry watchers felt that the hard stance taken by SGX in NOL's case reflects its concern over any potential leakage of material information before a public announcement is made.

But some observers felt that more can be done, such as having in place financial penalties for repeated or serious disclosure breaches, possibly incorporating a scheme where the quantum can rise exponentially.

Robson Lee, partner at Shook Lin & Bok LLP noted that all major transactions, be it rights issues, general offers or M&As, are susceptible to information leakage, given the number of parties involved - from company representatives, lawyers, financial advisors, bankers to investor relations consultants.

Even in a private share placement that involves fewer parties, there is still the risk of leakage when companies shop for placement agents, underwriters or share placees, he said.

'The guiding principle is always to announce any major plans that companies may have and if details of the plans are not sufficiently concrete at the time, to say that details will follow in a subsequent announcement,' added Yang Eu Jin, director of KW Capital.

'That should be the antidote to any market rumours,' he said.