Published November 19, 2009

MI-Reit manager hits out at rival CIT's proposal

Subordinated loan likely more pricey than MI-Reit's cost of equity

By CHEW XIANG

	Email this article
	Print article
	Feedback

THE battle for control of MacArthurCook Industrial Reit (MI-Reit) continued yesterday with MI-Reit's manager Nicholas McGrath slamming a rival proposal from Cambridge Industrial Trust (CIT) as 'entirely ingenuous'.

MI-Reit is asking unitholders to approve next Monday a $430 million rescue package involving a share placement to 'cornerstone' investors, a rights issue, and $215 million in new loans.

The troubled Reit needs the money to refinance $226 million in loans and meet a $90 million obligation to buy the 1A International Business Park (IBP) property, both by the end of the year.

But CIT, which bought a 9.76 per cent stake in MI-Reit after the announcement of the rescue package and is angling to take over management of MI-Reit, said the recapitalisation exercise destroyed value for unitholders as the discount to net asset value was too steep.

Non-sponsor existing unitholders post-transaction would be left with just 40 per cent of total holdings, CIT said, from over 70 per cent at present.

It is instead proposing itself as manager of MI-Reit and has pledged an 'initiative to take advantage of an enlarged pool of assets to benefit all investors', Chris Calvert, chief executive officer of its manager, said on Tuesday.

He said MI-Reit investors would benefit from access to a subordinated loan facility which CIT holds, and which it could use to fully pay off its $90 million obligation to buy the IBP property.

But in an interview yesterday with BT, Mr McGrath said a subordinated loan would likely be more expensive than MI-Reit's cost of equity and much higher than the 350 to 450 basis points over Sibor that it will pay for its negotiated term loan.

Mr McGrath added that MI-Reit's aggregate leverage would increase, while CIT, with just $13 million in cash, has little debt overhead to increase its own gearing. 'Any which way you put it, they will need to do capital raising and so far they've said nothing about that,' he said.

He admitted that an orderly sale of MI-Reit's assets - which has been suggested in some quarters, as its units are trading far below net asset value - might realise close to market value, or about 90 cents per unit. 'But I'm entirely uncomfortable with losing control of the process,' Mr McGrath said, adding that if creditors force a quick firesale, investors might be left with nothing.

The steep discounts were necessary because the Reit had to urgently raise a minimum of $125 million - twice its market capitalisation in June - to rebalance its capital structure so that it could take on new loans, Mr McGrath said.

In a report released on Tuesday, Phillip Securities analyst Lee Kok Joo said that whatever the outcome of the extraordinary general meeting on Monday, 'the risk is more on the part of CIT unitholders rather than MI-Reit unitholders' but said the proposal opens up the possibility that MI-Reit unitholders' stakes would not be heavily diluted.

According to its calculations, MI-Reit offers a potential FY2011 distribution per unit (DPU) of 1.89 cents, which translates into a dividend yield of 11 per cent based on the rights price of 15.9 cents, if the proposed transactions go through. 'For investors who are not keen, we maintain our 'sell' recommendation,' Phillips said.