Published October 31, 2008

Reit sponsors and their lucrative exit strategies

By UMA SHANKARI
Email this article
Print article
Feedback

MACQUARIE Group, which on Tuesday said it would sell its entire stake in Macquarie Prime Reit and the Reit's manager to Malaysia's YTL Corporation for $285 million, is certainly making a neat exit from its investment. However, the interests of minority shareholders, some of whom were waiting for a similar offer for their units, have not been as well served.

When the real estate investment trust (Reit) announced a strategic review in February, the management said it would sponsor the review with the specific objective of enhancing value for all unitholders. 'The review will consider both corporate and asset-level strategies, including the potential to provide unitholders with a proposal to acquire 100 per cent of (the Reit's) units,' management said then.

On Tuesday, Macquarie qualified that, while the review considered the potential to provide unitholders with a proposal to acquire 100 per cent of units, 'no firm offer was received in the current challenging capital markets environment'.

Having failed to find a buyer for all the units in the Reit, Macquarie decided to sell just its 26 per cent stake in the Reit as well as its 50 per cent interest in the Reit's manager. The bank wants to redeploy capital in new growth areas. But the deal sells other unitholders - who could have been waiting for a general offer since the February announcement - short.

It is debatable whether Macquarie could have got an offer for all the units in the Reit if it had been willing to accept a much lower price. Some unitholders BT spoke to, at least, are convinced that the bank could have. YTL is paying 82 cents a unit for 247.1 million shares in the Reit. The price is a 52 per cent premium over the last traded price of 54 cents last Friday, the last day of trading before the deal was announced on Tuesday.

The sale has also resulted in a change of sponsor and a fundamental change in terms of strategy and expertise. This should also have been an incentive for management to obtain the same terms for all the unitholders.

YTL's managing director Francis Yeoh has said that Macquarie Prime will be rebranded as Starhill Global Reit and will be YTL's main vehicle for acquiring prime retail space in Asia and the West. The YTL group also controls Bursa Malaysia-listed Starhill Reit, the country's largest Reit with four properties in Kuala Lumpur worth about US$430 million in all. Mr Yeoh has not ruled out the merger of the two Reits - which could change the profile of Macquarie Prime Reit, which currently owns $2.2 billion of retail and office properties in Singapore, China and Japan.

The deal is not the first such transaction this year. In July, Frasers Centrepoint purchased Allco Finance's 17.7 per cent stake in the then-Allco Commercial Trust (now Frasers Commercial Trust) at a 17 per cent premium to the last traded price - also bringing about a change of sponsor. But the difference between that deal and the Macquarie- YTL deal is that in the case of the latter, there was an implication that a proposal to acquire 100 per cent of the Reit's units could be forthcoming. A statement between February and October to the effect that no offer for 100 per cent of the units was likely and that Macquarie was now looking to sell its own stake could have avoided this mix-up.

Taking a wider view, there also appears to be a flaw in Singapore's Reit structure, which allows sponsors to charge high management fees for running the Reit and then obtain superior terms should they decide to exit their investments. Unitholders, who could have bought into a Reit because of the sponsor's brand name and pipeline, are then left holding a slightly different product. Perhaps there should be a moratorium of several years for sponsors before they can exit the Reit they promoted in the first place.